Let's start with a hypothetical scenario: If a marathon runner is the first person to cross the finish line and is given both a chip and gun time of 2 hours 45, and another runner of the same gender crosses the line as the 10th person but with a gun time of 2 hours 47, but a chip time of 2 hours 43, who is the winner? IAAF rules of competition say that the official time is the gun time, and that awards or prizes are given on that basis. I was once informed that the gun time is used as this ensures everybody in the race has the same conditions and therefore nobody has an advantage - rumour or not, the use of gun or chip time is certainly a contentious issue when it comes to winners and losers, and one that no doubt causes a great deal of debate. I've been a runner for well over 30 years now, and yet today was the first time I have experienced losing out on a podium position because 2 people that did not pass me in a race made the choice to start further back in the ...